Results at a glance
- Period
- FY2026Q3
- Revenue
- $1.2B (1,235.837 MUSD)
- Net income
- $249M (248.976 MUSD)
- Net margin
- 20.1%
From the Bloom Energy Open LedgerView the live ledgerIssuer filing (FY2026Q3)
Bloom Energy just printed the quarter its entire public history was building toward: revenue up 138% to $1.24 billion, a GAAP operating margin of 18%, $249 million of net income after five straight years of losses — and a third guidance raise alongside S&P 500 inclusion. The AI data-center power story is no longer a pipeline. It is a P&L.
The Headline Numbers
Every figure below comes from the Q3 FY2026 Form 10-Q and the earnings release. The Beancount fence models the quarter, so the headline table that gates it is Q3.
| Metric | Q3 FY2026 | Q3 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net revenue | $1,235.8M | $519.0M | +138.1% |
| Gross profit | $417.1M | $151.7M | +175.0% |
| Operating income | $225.4M | $7.8M | NM |
| Net income | $249.0M | $(23.0)M | NM |
| Diluted EPS (GAAP) | $0.78 | $(0.10) | NM |
| Diluted EPS (non-GAAP) | $0.94 | $0.15 | +527% |
| Operating cash flow (9M) | $272.9M | $(304.1)M | NM |
The deltas that matter are the margin ones, not the growth ones. Gross margin expanded 453 basis points to 33.8% while revenue more than doubled — this is operating leverage, not mix trickery: product revenue (+179%) grew faster than total revenue, and product carries the margin. Operating income went from $7.8 million to $225.4 million in four quarters, a 29x print that turns a perennial loss-maker GAAP-profitable in a single bound. And the cash line confirms it is real cash, not accrual engineering: nine-month operating cash flow swung by $577 million year over year, from deeply negative to solidly positive.
Revenue Deep Dive
Bloom discloses four revenue lines, and Q3 was a product quarter to an extreme degree.
| Revenue, USD millions | Q3 FY2026 | Q3 FY2025 | YoY | 9M FY2026 | 9M FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product (Energy Servers) | 1,073.6 | 384.3 | +179.4% | 2,662.4 | 892.8 |
| Installation | 84.9 | 65.8 | +29.0% | 161.8 | 136.8 |
| Service | 67.6 | 58.6 | +15.3% | 198.5 | 166.6 |
| Electricity | 9.8 | 10.4 | −5.2% | 29.7 | 50.1 |
| Total | 1,235.8 | 519.0 | +138.1% | 3,052.3 | 1,246.3 |
Product is 87% of revenue and 100% of the story: $1.07 billion of Energy Server acceptances, nearly triple the year-ago quarter. This is the AI data-center trade made physical — founder-CEO KR Sridhar's framing is that "what began with hyperscalers is rapidly moving across market segments because every business needs reliable power to grow," and the release positions Bloom as "the electricity platform for the digital era." The ledger line that confirms demand is real rather than stuffed: contract assets (unbilled, accepted product) ballooned from $178.9 million at year-end to $792.8 million — acceptances are outrunning invoicing, which is what a backlog converting faster than billing can process looks like. Whether that converts to cash on schedule is the bear case; more below.
Installation (+29%) notably lagged product (+179%), consistent with the 10-Q's disclosure that Bloom is evolving "to a consult only model particularly for large load sites" — hyperscalers install their own gear. That shift is margin-accretive (installation has historically run near breakeven: $84.9M of revenue on $89.0M of cost this quarter) and worth watching as a mix tailwind.
Service (+15%) is the annuity base growing steadily, and Electricity (−5%, now under 1% of revenue) continues its long fade from the financing-structure era — it was $178.9M of cost on $82.4M of revenue as recently as FY2023. The company Bloom is becoming sells boxes, not electrons.
One concentration flag belongs in this section, not buried: related-party revenue was $321.6 million in the quarter — 26% of total revenue — nearly all of it the SK ecoplant relationship. That is down from a higher share historically but still means one partner's acceptance timing moves the quarter by double digits.
The Margin Story
| Margin | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | Q3 FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 14.8% | 27.5% | 29.0% | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | −15.7% | +1.6% | +3.6% | +18.2% |
| Net margin | −23.1% | −1.8% | −4.3% | +20.1% |
Nineteen points of gross-margin expansion in under three years, with the mechanism fully visible in the cost lines: product cost of revenue is scaling sub-linearly (product gross margin now ~38%), while the structurally unprofitable electricity book shrinks to irrelevance. Operating expenses grew only 33% against 138% revenue growth — R&D up 32%, sales and marketing up 25% — which is genuine leverage, not cost-cutting; the company is spending into the ramp and still dropping 18 cents of every revenue dollar to operating income.
The below-the-line cleanup matters as much as the operations. Quarterly interest expense fell from a $27.1M average in FY2023 to $7.5M as converts were inducement-converted and termed out (the painful $66.2M conversion-inducement charge in FY2025 bought this quarter's clean P&L). Net margin at 20.1% actually exceeds operating margin at 18.2% — interest income ($22.1M on the $2.5B cash pile) plus $12.6M of other income now contribute. A company that lost money for five straight years now earns a fifth of revenue as profit. The arc is the story.
The One Big Question: how much of this quarter is pulled forward?
The bull case needs no elaboration — it is the headline table. The question a skeptical reader should ask is about the balance-sheet exhaust fumes of 138% growth, because three lines all point the same direction:
| Working-capital exhaust, USD millions | Dec 2025 | Sep 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract assets (current) | 178.9 | 792.8 | +343% |
| Customer consideration asset (current + non-current) | — | 306.5 | new |
| Accounts receivable | 371.8 | 634.7 | +71% |
| Deferred revenue + customer deposits (current + non-current) | 143.8 | 754.4 | +425% |
Contract assets are product accepted but not yet billable — $614 million of revenue recognized ahead of invoicing in nine months. Some of that is mechanical in a hypergrowth quarter (acceptances bunch at quarter-end), and deferred revenue growing even faster (+$611M) shows customers prepaying too, which cuts the other way. But the customer consideration asset is genuinely new and worth a stare: $306.5 million of upfront share-based consideration payable to "a customer's customer" — Bloom is paying in equity to win load, and the 10-Q's own risk factors flag "the ability of current product and service backlog to ultimately be recognizable as revenue" alongside AI-adoption slowdown and data-center financing availability.
None of this says the revenue is fake — cash collected validates most of it, with operating cash flow positive $273M for nine months. It says the quality of the next two quarters depends on conversion: do the $793M of contract assets invoice and collect, or do they age? The falsifiable tripwires are right there on the Q4 balance sheet: contract assets flat-or-down while revenue grows (bullish), doubtful-account allowance rising from today's $3.0M (bearish), and whether related-party SK revenue stays near 26% or diversifies down. Growth this fast always borrows working capital from the future; Q4 shows whether the future pays it back.
Tracking a $4.5B-guidance company in plain text
Hypergrowth is where double-entry earns its keep: every dollar of that $614 million contract-asset build has to reconcile against revenue recognized, and a plain-text ledger makes the reconciliation auditable line by line. Our how we model every company guide documents the conventions; here is Bloom's Q3 income statement as booked, signs and all (income is negative, expenses positive, and the check comment proves the transaction sums to zero):
; Check: −1,235.837 + 818.733 + 64.146 + 52.409 + 75.100 + 7.525 − 22.129 + 2.897 − 12.627 − 0.010 + 0.817 + 248.976 = 0 ✓
2026-09-30 * "Bloom Energy Corporation" "FY2026Q3 Income Statement"
Income:Revenue -1235.837 MUSD ; total revenue: Product 1,073.610 + Installation 84.855 + Service 67.557 + Electricity 9.815 (incl. related-party revenue 321.6)
Expenses:CostOfRevenue 818.733 MUSD ; total cost of revenue: Product 666.978 + Installation 88.954 + Service 55.508 + Electricity 7.293
Expenses:ResearchAndDevelopment 64.146 MUSD ; research and development
Expenses:SellingGeneralAdministrative 52.409 MUSD ; sales and marketing — the filing's own line
Expenses:SellingGeneralAdministrative 75.100 MUSD ; general and administrative — the filing's own line
Income:OtherNet 7.525 MUSD ; interest expense — the filing's own line
Income:OtherNet -22.129 MUSD ; interest income — the filing's own line
Income:OtherNet 2.897 MUSD ; equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliates — the filing's own line
Income:OtherNet -12.627 MUSD ; other income, net — the filing's own line
Income:OtherNet -0.010 MUSD ; gain on revaluation of embedded derivatives — the filing's own line
Expenses:IncomeTax 0.817 MUSD ; income tax provision
Equity:Adjustments 248.976 MUSD ; consolidated net income offset (deficit set by balance assertion; NCI share (1.295))The balance-sheet number that tells the narrative is the accumulated deficit: $(3,986.983)M at the end of FY2025, $(3,470.694)M today — nine months of profit erased half a billion of a deficit built over a decade, while cash held steady near $2.5B and recourse debt actually fell. That is a company crossing from cash-burn to cash-generation with the receipts to prove it. Explore all six periods below:
The Multi-Year Arc
| Fiscal year | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | Q3 FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net revenue | $972.2M | $1,199.1M | $1,333.5M | $1,473.9M | $2,024.0M | $1,235.8M |
| Gross margin | 20.3% | 12.4% | 14.8% | 27.5% | 29.0% | 33.8% |
| Operating income | $(114.5)M | $(261.0)M | $(208.9)M | $22.9M | $72.8M | $225.4M |
| Net income | $(193.4)M | $(315.1)M | $(307.9)M | $(27.2)M | $(87.1)M | $249.0M |
| Cash + restricted | $615.1M | $518.4M | $745.2M | $951.0M | $2,481.6M | $2,508.1M |
| Recourse debt (non-current) | $283.5M | $273.1M | $842.0M | $1,010.4M | $2,613.7M | $2,473.5M |
Read left to right, this is a financing story becoming an operating story. FY2021–23 burned cash and borrowed to survive (recourse debt tripled to fund the ramp); FY2024 reached operating breakeven; FY2025 raised $1.6B of debt into a $2.5B cash fortress while operations turned modestly profitable; and Q3 FY2026 is the quarter the machine started paying for itself — one quarter of net income ($249M) exceeding any full year in company history, with capex running at 7x last year's pace ($231.3M in nine months) to build capacity for the backlog. The FY2026 guide of $4.4–4.6B revenue at ~34% non-GAAP gross implies Q4 roughly matching Q3 — the company is guiding as if this quarter is the new run rate, not a spike.
The Verdict: Bull vs. Bear
Bull Case
- The profit inflection is structural, not cyclical. Five years of losses flipped to a 20% net margin in one quarter on product operating leverage that scales with volume — every incremental Energy Server carries ~38% product gross margin.
- Demand visibility extends past the guide. Third raise of the year, $4.4–4.6B (+122% at midpoint), non-GAAP EPS guide of $3.10–3.40, and S&P 500 inclusion forcing index ownership — momentum plus sponsorship.
- Cash validates the accruals. Nine-month operating cash flow of $272.9M vs −$304.1M a year ago; cash steady at $2.5B while funding 7x capex internally; recourse debt falling quarter over quarter.
- The TAM story just started. "What began with hyperscalers is rapidly moving across market segments" — if distributed power follows the AI buildout into enterprise and industrial, product revenue has years of runway past this quarter's $1.07B.
- Below-the-line drags are gone. Quarterly interest expense down 48% year over year ($14.4M → $7.5M) and 72% from the FY2023 quarterly average, converts termed out, electricity book nearly wound down — the P&L is clean operating leverage from here.
Bear Case
- A quarter of revenue is one related party. SK ecoplant drove $321.6M (26%) of Q3 revenue and $697.7M over nine months — acceptance timing by a single partner can swing any quarter by double digits, and concentration has not fallen as fast as growth.
- $1.1B of working-capital exhaust. Contract assets +$614M, receivables +$263M, and a brand-new $306.5M customer-consideration asset mean recognized revenue is well ahead of cash process — exactly the shape that unwinds painfully if acceptances slow.
- Growth is bought as well as earned. The $306.5M share-based customer consideration is equity-funded demand creation; combined with 15.5M new shares in nine months (280.0M → 295.5M), per-share economics trail the headline growth.
- The guide prices perfection into Q4. $4.4–4.6B full-year implies Q4 of $1.35–1.55B — up to 25% above this record quarter — with premium valuation leaving no room for the air-permitting, interconnection, or financing delays the 10-Q itself lists as risks.
- Cyclical history says hardware spikes fade. Product revenue tripled in a year on data-center urgency; if AI capex pauses — the 10-Q's own risk factor #19 — Bloom has no recurring base big enough (service is 5% of revenue) to cushion the fall.
Our Take
Own the inflection, watch the receivables. Bloom earned its re-rating the hard way — real GAAP profit, real cash flow, real operating leverage, all in the same quarter — and the third guidance raise plus S&P inclusion say management sees more of it. But $1.24 billion quarters built on $793 million of unbilled acceptances and 26% related-party concentration deserve a show-me stance on Q4 conversion, not extrapolation. The long thesis is intact; the entry should wait for contract assets to prove they collect.





