Your biggest customer pays on 60-day terms, payroll runs this Friday, and the bank just reminded you the overdraft limit is not a suggestion. Meanwhile $80,000 of your money sits in issued invoices, doing nothing for anyone except your customers' cash flow. That gap between doing the work and getting paid is exactly what receivables finance exists to close — and the two main products that close it look almost identical until you ask two questions: who collects from your customers, and who knows the facility exists?
The answers divide the market into factoring and invoice discounting. Pick the wrong one and you either pay for a collections service you do not need or hand your customer relationships to a third party whose chasing style you have never vetted. This guide walks through how each works, what each costs, how each hits your books, and how to choose.
The One Distinction: Selling Invoices vs. Borrowing Against Them
Both products advance you cash against unpaid invoices, typically 70 to 90 percent of face value within a day or two of raising the invoice. The balance, minus fees, follows when your customer pays. The difference is what legally happens to the invoice in between.
With factoring, you sell the receivable to the finance provider. The factor owns the invoice, collects it, and runs the credit-control process — statements, reminders, chasing calls — on your sales ledger. Your customers are notified and pay the factor directly.
With invoice discounting, you borrow against the receivable and keep owning it. The invoice stays yours, your team keeps collecting it, and your customers keep paying you exactly as before. The loan is secured on your sales ledger, and repayments happen automatically as customer payments arrive.
A useful shorthand: factoring outsources your credit control along with the funding; discounting funds you and leaves the collecting to you. Everything else — cost, eligibility, confidentiality, accounting — flows from that split.
Factoring: The Factor Buys Your Invoices and Chases Them
Here is the typical factoring cycle for a $50,000 invoice on 30-day terms:
- You raise the invoice and assign it to the factor, usually through an online portal.
- The factor advances around 85 percent — $42,500 — within 24 to 48 hours.
- The factor's collections team manages the invoice: sending statements, reminding your customer, escalating if it goes overdue.
- Your customer pays the factor the full $50,000.
- The factor releases the $7,500 reserve minus its fees.
Because the factor does the collecting, factoring is always disclosed: your customers receive a notice of assignment telling them to pay the factor instead of you. There is no confidential version — a third party cannot chase your customers without them knowing it exists.
That disclosure is the product's biggest practical consideration. A good factor chases professionally and your customers barely notice; a heavy-handed one can strain relationships you spent years building. Before signing, ask for the reminder sequence and a sample call script — the cheapest factor is no bargain if it costs you a repeat customer.
Factoring suits businesses without a credit-control function: smaller firms where the owner chases invoices at 9 p.m., fast growers whose ledger is outrunning their admin capacity, and suppliers to a few large, slow-paying customers.
Invoice Discounting: You Borrow, You Collect, Nobody Knows
Invoice discounting strips out the collections service and keeps only the funding. You raise invoices, you chase them, your customers pay into what looks like your normal bank account — in reality usually a trust account in your name controlled by the provider, which sweeps receipts against your loan balance automatically.
Discounting comes in two flavors:
- Confidential invoice discounting (CID). Your customers never know the facility exists. Statements, reminders, and bank details all carry your branding. This is the most popular form and the one most established businesses choose.
- Disclosed invoice discounting (DID). Customers are told about the facility, usually because the provider wants the extra security of direct payment. It behaves like factoring without the collections service: disclosed, but you still do the chasing.
Confidentiality is valuable — nobody wants customers wondering whether their supplier is short of cash — but it makes the provider's life harder. With CID the provider cannot verify invoices directly with your customers or step in early when one goes quiet, so fraud risk sits higher. That is why confidential facilities carry the strictest eligibility in receivables finance: providers typically want several years of profitable trading, a clean and well-aged sales ledger, a spread of debtors rather than one dominant customer, and solid internal credit-control procedures. Some will also ask directors for personal guarantees and register a charge over the company's book debts.
The message is blunt but fair: discounting is a facility for businesses that already collect well and just want the cash sooner. If your ledger is messy and your chasing is sporadic, fix that first — a discounter will find it during due diligence anyway.
Side by Side: Factoring vs. Invoice Discounting
| Factoring | Invoice discounting | |
|---|---|---|
| What happens to the invoice | Sold to the provider | Stays yours; pledged as security |
| Who collects from customers | The provider | You |
| Do customers know | Always (disclosed) | Usually not (confidential) |
| Credit management included | Yes — statements, chasing, ledger admin | No — you keep the whole job |
| Typical advance rate | 70–90% of face value | 70–95% of face value |
| Typical cost | Higher: service fee plus interest | Lower: mostly just interest |
| Bad-debt risk | Can sit with provider (non-recourse) | Almost always stays with you |
| Eligibility | Accessible to younger businesses | Needs trading history and clean ledger |
| Best for | No credit-control team, fast growth | Established firms with solid collections |
Recourse vs. Non-Recourse: Who Eats the Bad Debt
Separate from the factoring-versus-discounting choice is the question of what happens when a customer simply never pays. That is governed by recourse.
- With recourse (the standard): if the customer defaults, the provider claws the advance back from you — by offsetting it against other invoices' reserves, debiting your account, or calling on guarantees. You kept the credit risk all along; the provider only funded the timing gap.
- Without recourse (non-recourse): the provider absorbs the loss if your customer becomes insolvent, effectively bundling bad-debt protection into the facility. It costs more — typically one to two percentage points above recourse pricing — and it usually covers insolvency only, not disputes. If your customer refuses to pay because the work was defective, that invoice comes back to you under either structure.
Invoice discounting is almost always with recourse: since you control the collections process, no provider will underwrite the outcome of it. Non-recourse is a factoring feature, and even there it is selective — the factor approves credit limits per customer and only protects invoices inside those limits. Read the exclusion list before assuming a bad debt is someone else's problem.
What Each One Costs
Receivables finance usually prices in two parts:
- The service fee, a percentage of each invoice's face value covering administration and, for factoring, the collections work. Expect roughly 0.5 to 3 percent, with factoring at the higher end of the range because a team of people is chasing your ledger.
- The discount charge, interest on the cash actually advanced, quoted as a margin over a base or prime rate and charged for the days each advance is outstanding. Think of it like overdraft interest that scales with your sales.
Take a $100,000 invoice funded for 60 days at an 85 percent advance, a 1.5 percent service fee, and a discount charge of 8 percent per year. The service fee is $1,500. The discount charge is $85,000 times 8 percent times 60/365, about $1,118. Total cost: roughly $2,600, or 2.6 percent of the invoice, to get $85,000 in two days instead of $100,000 in sixty.
Why discounting costs less is now obvious: there is no collections team to pay for, so the service fee shrinks and interest dominates the bill. But the headline rate is not the whole story. Ask about minimum monthly fees, audit and termination fees, concentration limits on your largest customer, and which invoices are ineligible — old, disputed, and connected-company invoices are routinely excluded. A low rate with a high minimum is the expensive option for a seasonal business, and on thin margins the all-in cost can eat the profit the facility was meant to accelerate.
How Each One Hits Your Books
The accounting follows the legal substance, and the two products land on opposite sides of an important line: sale versus borrowing.
Non-recourse factoring can be a true sale. You transfer the receivable and substantially all of its risk to the factor, so under ASC 860 (and the equivalent derecognition logic in IFRS 9) the receivable comes off your balance sheet. You debit cash for the advance, debit a loss or factoring-expense account for the fees and the retained reserve, and credit receivables for the full face value. Your disclosed borrowings do not rise, which can matter for covenant calculations.
Recourse factoring and all invoice discounting are secured borrowings. Because you keep the risk of non-payment — and with discounting you keep the receivable itself — the invoices stay on your balance sheet and the advance is recorded as a liability. Each customer payment then reduces both the receivable and the loan. Nothing is derecognized, and your reported debt is higher than under a true sale, so check how your other loan covenants treat the facility before you sign.
Either way, keep the facility's movements out of your revenue. The advance is not income and the reserve release is not a second payment — a surprisingly common error when the factor's statements start arriving. Reconcile the provider's monthly statement to your sales ledger the way you would reconcile a bank account, and investigate any invoice the provider marks ineligible before it quietly starves your available funding.
Sketching it in a plain-text ledger
If you keep your books in plain text, the two structures look like this. First, a factored invoice with recourse — the advance arrives as a loan, secured on the receivable:
2026-10-02 * "Factor advance - invoice 1042" "Customer: Baker Wholesale, face value $50,000"
Assets:Checking 42,500.00 USD
Expenses:Factoring-Fees 1,500.00 USD
Liabilities:Factor-Advance -44,000.00 USDWhen the customer pays the factor and the reserve is released net of the discount charge:
2026-11-03 * "Factor reserve released - invoice 1042" "Customer paid in full"
Assets:Checking 6,382.00 USD
Expenses:Factoring-Fees 1,118.00 USD
Liabilities:Factor-Advance -44,000.00 USD
Assets:Receivable:Baker-Wholesale 36,500.00 USDInvoice discounting is simpler — one loan account against the whole ledger, drawn and repaid continuously:
2026-10-02 * "Discounting drawdown against October ledger"
Assets:Checking 85,000.00 USD
Liabilities:Discounting-Facility -85,000.00 USD
2026-10-15 * "Customer receipts swept against discounting facility"
Liabilities:Discounting-Facility 60,000.00 USD
Assets:Trust-Collection-Account -60,000.00 USDThe discipline that matters in both cases is the monthly three-way match: your sales ledger, the provider's statement, and your bank. Automate the import if your tools allow it — the docs on importing bank statements show the general pattern. A receivables facility you do not reconcile monthly will eventually surprise you, usually by funding less than you assumed.
How to Choose: Five Questions
1. Do you have someone to chase invoices? If collections currently happen when the owner finds a spare evening, factoring buys you a whole credit-control department on day one. If you already run a tight ledger with a dedicated person or process, paying a factor to redo that work is waste.
2. How much does confidentiality matter? Businesses with a few large, relationship-sensitive customers often prefer confidential discounting — or at minimum want veto rights over the factor's escalation steps. If your customer base is broad and transactional, disclosure is a non-issue.
3. Can you qualify for discounting? Be honest about your ledger's age profile, your trading history, and your customer concentration. There is no point holding out for confidential discounting if two customers represent 70 percent of receivables; apply for the facility you can actually get.
4. How bad would one default be? If a single customer failure would threaten the business, non-recourse factoring's bad-debt protection may be worth its premium — or compare it against standalone credit insurance, which can be cheaper when bought separately.
5. How fast is the ledger growing? Both facilities scale with sales, which is their great advantage over a fixed overdraft: every new invoice creates new availability automatically. But check the facility cap and the concentration limits, because a cap you hit in month three turns a flexible facility into a fixed one.
Mistakes That Turn Good Facilities Bad
Treating it as rescue finance. Both products work best for growing, profitable businesses smoothing a timing gap. If the underlying business is loss-making, accelerating cash collection just accelerates the rate at which losses consume the funding. Providers know this — it is why discounters ask for years of profitable accounts — and using the facility to mask insolvency can create personal liability for directors down the line.
Ignoring the recourse clause. The most expensive misunderstanding in receivables finance is discovering, after a customer fails, that "the factor handles collections" never meant "the factor absorbs defaults." Know whether your facility has recourse, what triggers a clawback, and how fast it happens.
Pledging the same invoices twice. Discounters register a charge over your book debts precisely to stop double-funding. Offering the same ledger to two providers is not creative treasury management; it is the fact pattern behind most receivables-finance fraud cases.
Letting ineligible invoices pile up. Old, disputed, and concentrated invoices fall outside the funding formula silently. If nobody watches the ineligible list, available funding drifts down while the minimum monthly fee stays exactly where it was.
Skipping the cash forecast anyway. A facility changes the timing of receipts; it does not remove the need to forecast them. Keep projecting weekly cash for at least thirteen weeks, with the facility's fees and reserve mechanics modeled in, so a slow-paying month shows up as a number on a screen instead of a surprise in the bank balance.
Your Next Step: Price Your Own Gap Before You Price Facilities
Pull your aged receivables report tonight and compute two numbers: your days sales outstanding, and the cash tied up in invoices older than your standard terms. Multiply that tied-up balance by your best guess at the facility's all-in cost — around 2 to 3 percent per 60-day cycle is a reasonable starting assumption — and you have the monthly price of closing your gap. Then get quotes from at least two providers, one factor and one discounter if you can qualify, and compare them on the all-in cost for your actual ledger mix rather than the headline rate. The right facility is the one whose cost fits inside the margin of the sales it funds — with room to spare for the month your biggest customer pays late.





