Skip to main content

Conagra Q1 FY2027 Earnings: EPS Up 6% on Falling Sales, and a Flour Mill Is Why

Published 17 min readMike ThriftMike Thrift
Conagra Q1 FY2027 Earnings: EPS Up 6% on Falling Sales, and a Flour Mill Is Why
On this page

Results at a glance

Period
FY2027Q1
Revenue
$2.6B (2,595.9 MUSD)
Net income
$174.3M (174.3 MUSD)
Net margin
6.7%

From the Conagra Open LedgerView the live ledgerIssuer filing (FY2027Q1)

Conagra Brands sold less food in the first quarter of fiscal 2027 and earned more per share. Net sales fell 1.4% to $2,595.9 million. Organic volume fell 2.1%, and price/mix recovered only 1.0% of it. Gross profit fell 3.4%. Yet net income rose 6.0% to $174.3 million, diluted EPS rose 5.9% to $0.36, and adjusted EPS rose 5.1% to $0.41. The food business did not produce that gain. Adjusted operating profit fell 4.1%. What rose was Conagra's share of earnings from the Ardent Mills flour-milling joint venture, up 71.8% to $50.4 million, on top of an overhead line that fell $20 million before advertising. We rebuilt five fiscal years plus this quarter as a public Beancount ledger, with every impairment and divestiture on its own labeled line, so the parts of this profit that come from selling food can be read apart from the parts that do not. It sits beside General Mills, which shares Conagra's May fiscal year and its problem.

The Headline Numbers​

MetricQ1 FY2027Q1 FY2026YoY
Net sales$2,595.9M$2,632.6M−1.4%
Organic net sales$2,590.9M$2,619.4M−1.1%
Organic volume——−2.1%
Price/mix——+1.0%
Gross margin23.8%24.3%−50 bps
Operating profit (reported)$268.4M$347.4M−22.7%
Operating margin (reported)10.3%13.2%−285 bps
Adjusted operating profit$297.9M$310.7M−4.1%
Adjusted operating margin11.5%11.8%−33 bps
Net income$174.3M$164.5M+6.0%
Adjusted net income$197.3M$189.2M+4.3%
Diluted EPS$0.36$0.34+5.9%
Adjusted diluted EPS$0.41$0.39+5.1%

The organic bridge is short. Reported net sales fell 1.4%. Foreign exchange added 0.2 points and divested businesses took away 0.5, which leaves organic net sales down 1.1%. That 1.1% is a 2.1% volume decline partly offset by 1.0% of price/mix. Conagra raised prices and sold fewer units, and the price did not cover the units.

Reported operating profit fell 22.7%, and most of that drop is a comparison effect in both directions. Last year's quarter held a $42.4 million gain on divestitures, mainly the Chef Boyardee sale. This year's quarter holds $29.5 million of items the company excludes: $9.7 million of restructuring, $8.1 million of legacy legal matters net of recoveries, $5.2 million of hedging losses, $3.5 million of executive transition costs and $3.0 million of environmental matters. Remove both sets and adjusted operating profit went from $310.7 million to $297.9 million, a decline of 4.1%.

Net income went the other way, and the release's reconciliation shows why. Adjusted income before taxes rose $10.0 million, from $252.4 million to $262.4 million, while adjusted operating profit fell $12.8 million. The difference sits below operating profit. Equity method investment earnings rose $21.0 million, net interest expense fell $2.0 million, and pension income slipped $0.2 million. On the reported line there is one more helper: the effective tax rate was 25.2% against 43.1% a year ago, "when the rate was affected by the Chef Boyardee and frozen seafood divestitures".

Revenue Deep Dive​

SegmentNet sales Q1 FY2027Q1 FY2026ReportedOrganicVolumePrice/mixAdj. op. profitAdj. YoY
Grocery & Snacks$1,051.1M$1,079.6M−2.6%−2.0%−5.4%+3.4%$204.9M−7.2%
Refrigerated & Frozen$1,053.8M$1,076.2M−2.1%−1.6%−0.1%−1.5%$99.6M−13.0%
International$218.1M$212.3M+2.7%+0.9%−0.7%+1.6%$34.4M−8.6%
Foodservice$272.9M$264.5M+3.2%+3.3%+2.5%+0.8%$30.9M+11.4%
Total$2,595.9M$2,632.6M−1.4%−1.1%−2.1%+1.0%$297.9M−4.1%

The total adjusted operating profit of $297.9 million is after $71.9 million of adjusted corporate expense. The four segments together earned $369.8 million, down 7.7% from $400.6 million.

Grocery & Snacks is where the price-volume trade is clearest. Price/mix rose 3.4% and volume fell 5.4%. The 10-Q attributes both to "inflation-driven pricing and corresponding elasticity impacts". That is the company saying, in its own filing, that shoppers bought less because the price went up. The segment still earns a 19.5% margin, the highest in the company, but adjusted profit fell 7.2%.

Refrigerated & Frozen has the opposite shape and a worse result. Volume was nearly flat at −0.1%, and price/mix fell 1.5%, which the 10-Q says "was driven by unfavorable product mix". Adjusted operating profit fell 13.0% to $99.6 million, a 9.4% margin. This is the segment whose goodwill was written down at the end of fiscal 2026. The 10-Q says the reporting unit was "written down to fair value as of the end of fiscal 2026, resulting in zero excess fair value over carrying amount", and carries "a heightened risk of future impairments".

International grew 0.9% organically, with 2.4 points more from foreign exchange. Foodservice was the only segment with volume growth, at 2.5%, and the release adds a caveat: volumes "benefited approximately 150 basis points due to timing of customer orders, which occurred in the third quarter last year." Take the timing out and Foodservice volume grew about 1%.

We read the release and the 10-Q for the seven demand and supply themes we track in every earnings post. None of the strong-demand phrasings appears. There is no "robust demand", no tight supply, no upcycle, no product launch running ahead of plan. The 10-Q opens its outlook with the reverse: "Our industry continues to be impacted by weak consumer sentiment, inflation, commodity cost fluctuations, supply chain pressures, trade and regulatory uncertainty, and other global macroeconomic challenges." The one positive volume signal is share: the company says it "gained dollar share in categories including frozen vegetables, pudding, chili, frozen breakfast, hot dogs, and frozen desserts." Gaining share while volume falls 2.1% means the categories themselves are shrinking.

The Margin Story​

PeriodNet salesGross marginOperating marginMargin before impairments and divestituresNet margin
FY2023$12,277.0M26.6%8.8%14.9%5.6%
FY2024$12,050.9M27.7%7.1%15.3%2.9%
FY2025$11,612.8M25.9%11.8%12.6%9.9%
FY2026$11,281.6M23.9%−14.4%11.2%−17.0%
Q1 FY2027$2,595.9M23.8%10.3%10.3%6.7%

The fourth column is ledger arithmetic, not a company measure: operating profit with the goodwill impairments, brand impairments and divestiture gains and losses added back, and nothing else. It differs from Conagra's adjusted operating margin, which also removes restructuring, legal and hedging items. For the two earliest years the 10-K shows no operating profit line, so operating margin here is net sales less cost of goods sold and SG&A as filed.

Gross margin is the line to watch, because none of the one-off items touch it. It peaked at 27.7% in fiscal 2024 and has fallen for two years, to 23.9% in fiscal 2026 and 23.8% this quarter. The release explains the quarter: "higher productivity and approximately $4 million in tariff refunds were more than offset by lower organic net sales, the negative impact of cost of goods sold inflation, and unfavorable operating leverage." Unfavorable operating leverage is the volume decline showing up in cost. Plants running fewer units spread the same fixed cost over less product.

Pricing is the theme that needs care. Price/mix was positive at +1.0%, and the 10-Q promises more: "We expect to have implemented additional targeted price increases to help offset input cost inflation by the end of the first half of fiscal 2027." The next sentence gives the cost of that plan: "continued consumer sensitivity to price increases may negatively impact our volumes." The ledger agrees with the warning. Cost of goods sold fell only 0.7% while volume fell 2.1%.

So the margin was not defended in gross profit. It was defended one line down. Adjusted SG&A fell 3.7% to $320.7 million, even though advertising and promotion inside it rose 15.1% to $60.9 million. Take advertising out and the rest of adjusted SG&A fell from $279.9 million to $259.8 million, a $20.1 million reduction. The release says the adjusted figure includes "a $10 million benefit related to fiscal 2026 incentive compensation". Half of the overhead saving, in other words, is a benefit tied to last year's incentive compensation, and it will not repeat.

The One Big Question: Is This Profit Coming From Food?​

Put the adjusted year-over-year changes in one column and the answer is visible.

Change in adjusted pre-tax income, Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2026USD millions
Adjusted gross profit−24.9
Advertising and promotion (higher spend)−8.0
Other adjusted SG&A (lower spend)+20.1
Adjusted operating profit−12.8
Equity method investment earnings+21.0
Interest expense, net+2.0
Pension and postretirement non-service income−0.2
Adjusted income before income taxes+10.0

Everything Conagra makes and sells contributed −$24.9 million. Overhead gave back $20.1 million, half of it a one-time item. The entire increase in pre-tax income, and more, came from equity method investment earnings, which the release says rose "primarily driven by favorable market conditions and effective management through recent volatility in wheat markets for the Ardent Mills joint venture." Conagra owns 44% of Ardent Mills, a flour miller. It is a good asset. It is also a commodity business whose earnings moved 72% in a year, and $50.4 million of it was 22% of this quarter's $232.9 million of pre-tax income.

The guidance says management knows this. The company reaffirmed adjusted EPS of $1.40 to $1.50, an adjusted operating margin of 10.0% to 10.5% and organic net sales of −3% to −1%, and it assumes an "equity earnings contribution of approximately $140 million" for the year. The first quarter delivered $50.4 million of that $140 million, about 36% of the year in 25% of the time. It also delivered an 11.5% adjusted operating margin against a full-year range that tops out at 10.5%. Both figures imply that the remaining three quarters are expected to be weaker than this one. The CEO described "profit ahead of expectations", and the reaffirmed range is the company's own statement that the excess is not expected to continue.

General Mills, which reported a week earlier, is the natural comparison. The figures below come from each company's release.

Q1 FY2027ConagraGeneral Mills
Net sales−1.4%−2.8%
Organic net sales−1.1%flat
Adjusted gross margin23.8% (−62 bps)33.3% (−90 bps)
Adjusted operating profit−4.1%−10.9%
Adjusted operating margin11.5%14.4%
Adjusted diluted EPS+5.1%−12.8%
Net interest as a share of operating profit34.2%22.4%

Both companies lost gross margin to input costs and lower volume. General Mills let it fall through to earnings. Conagra covered it with overhead and a joint venture. Conagra also carries more debt against its earnings: net interest of $91.8 million consumed 34% of operating profit, and the release puts net leverage at 3.99x adjusted EBITDA.

That leverage explains the quietest number in the filing. The 10-Q's equity statement shows dividends declared of $0.175 per share, $84.0 million, against $0.35 and $167.7 million a year earlier. The dividend was cut in half. The cash flow statement still shows $167.5 million paid, because the last $0.35 payment went out in June, so the saving of about $84 million a quarter starts with the September payment. The CEO's list of priorities includes "rebalancing capital allocation", and this is what it means in the ledger.

Tracking a $11B Food Company in Plain Text​

Double-entry is useful here because Conagra's last five years are full of charges that a summary can blur. In a ledger each one has to be a posting with an amount, and the balance sheet still has to tie after it. The conventions match every other company in this series: how we model every company. Income postings are credits (negative), expenses are debits (positive), and Equity:Adjustments absorbs net income, so each income-statement transaction sums to zero while the balance assertions pin retained earnings. This is the quarter as pushed to the ledger:

; Check: −2595.9 + 1977.2 + 350.3 + 91.8 − 56.3 + 58.6 + 174.3 = 0 ✓
2026-08-30 * "Conagra Brands, Inc." "FY2027Q1 Income Statement"
  Income:Revenue                              -2595.9 MUSD  ; net sales
  Expenses:CostOfRevenue                       1977.2 MUSD  ; cost of goods sold
  Expenses:SellingGeneralAdministrative         350.3 MUSD  ; selling, general and administrative expenses
  Expenses:Interest                              91.8 MUSD  ; interest expense, net
  Expenses:OtherNet                             -56.3 MUSD  ; pension and postretirement non-service income −5.9; equity method investment earnings −50.4
  Expenses:IncomeTax                             58.6 MUSD  ; income tax expense
  Equity:Adjustments                            174.3 MUSD  ; net income attributable to Conagra Brands offset (RE set by balance assertion)

Expenses:OtherNet is negative because it nets two income lines that sit below operating profit: $5.9 million of pension income and the $50.4 million from the joint venture. The ledger does not model a separate Q1 FY2026 period, so the prior-year column in the tables above comes from the release. There are no impairment or divestiture postings this quarter. Fiscal 2026 is where they are:

; Excerpt: three of the ten postings in FY2026/FY2026.bean
2026-05-31 * "Conagra Brands, Inc." "FY2026 Income Statement"
  Expenses:OtherNet                            2382.4 MUSD  ; goodwill impairment charges
  Expenses:OtherNet                             547.2 MUSD  ; other intangible asset impairment charges
  Expenses:OtherNet                             -42.2 MUSD  ; gain on divestitures (Chef Boyardee and frozen fish businesses)
  ...

Those three lines turned a year with $2,698.4 million of gross profit into a $1,916.2 million net loss.

The balance-sheet line that carries the narrative is goodwill. It was $11,329.2 million at the end of fiscal 2022 and is $8,118.9 million now. Brands and other intangibles fell from $3,853.1 million to $1,819.8 million over the same period. The 10-Ks say the impaired brands were primarily those acquired with Pinnacle Foods and recorded at fair value in fiscal 2019, and they name them: Birds Eye, Gardein, Duncan Hines, Vlasic. Even after the write-downs, goodwill alone is larger than the company's $6,404.9 million of stockholders' equity.

Open Conagra Brands Financial Ledger FY2022–FY2027 Q1 in a new tab

The Multi-Year Arc​

PeriodNet salesGross marginImpairments and divestituresNet incomeGoodwillTotal debt
FY2022$11,535.9M24.6%$279.1M$888.2M$11,329.2M$8,979.8M
FY2023$12,277.0M26.6%$757.6M$683.6M$11,178.2M$9,238.7M
FY2024$12,050.9M27.7%$993.1M$347.2M$10,582.7M$8,441.3M
FY2025$11,612.8M25.9%$101.6M$1,152.4M$10,501.9M$8,067.6M
FY2026$11,281.6M23.9%$2,887.4M$(1,916.2)M$8,119.3M$7,268.4M
Q1 FY2027$2,595.9M23.8%—$174.3M$8,118.9M$7,760.1M

Net sales peaked at $12.3 billion in fiscal 2023, when inflation-era pricing was at its fullest, and have fallen three years in a row. Fiscal 2026 had a 53rd week and still came in $331 million below fiscal 2025. Gross margin rose with that pricing to 27.7% and then gave back almost four points.

The impairments column is the cost of past acquisitions arriving in installments. Every one of the five fiscal years has a charge. Together, impairments and divestiture losses net of the one gain add up to $5,018.8 million, against $1,155.2 million of cumulative net income over the same five years. Fiscal 2025's $1,152.4 million looks like a recovery, and partly is not: income tax expense that year was $3.7 million, which the 10-K explains as "a release of a valuation allowance from a federal audit settlement that gave rise to a $225.8 million tax benefit".

The one line that improved steadily is debt. Notes payable and long-term debt together fell from $9.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2023 to $7.3 billion at the end of fiscal 2026, helped by $648.9 million of proceeds from selling Chef Boyardee and the frozen fish business. It rose again this quarter, by $491.7 million, when the company issued $500 million of 5.40% notes due 2031. First-quarter operating cash flow was −$4.2 million as inventories rose $248.6 million, capital spending took $123.7 million, and dividends and buybacks took another $211.5 million.

The Verdict: Bull vs. Bear​

Bull Case

  • EPS grew on both bases, to $0.36 reported and $0.41 adjusted, in a quarter where General Mills' adjusted EPS fell 12.8%, and the full-year guidance was reaffirmed.
  • Overhead is coming down. Adjusted SG&A outside advertising fell $20.1 million while advertising rose 15.1%, which is the right direction for both lines.
  • Debt has fallen $1.5 billion from its fiscal 2023 peak, and halving the dividend frees about $84 million a quarter for more of the same.
  • Foodservice grew volume, and the company gained dollar share in six named categories.
  • The balance sheet has been marked down. After $2.9 billion of impairments in fiscal 2026, the Refrigerated & Frozen unit and the impaired brands are carried at fair value.

Bear Case

  • None of the seven demand themes appears in the release or the 10-Q. The filing describes "weak consumer sentiment" and says price increases may reduce volume further, so the numbers support no demand recovery.
  • The food business earned less. Adjusted gross profit fell $24.9 million, adjusted operating profit fell 4.1%, and three of four segments lost profit.
  • The profit growth came from a flour-milling joint venture that delivered 36% of its expected full-year earnings in one quarter, and from a $10 million incentive-compensation benefit that does not repeat.
  • Guidance of a 10.0% to 10.5% adjusted operating margin, against 11.5% this quarter, means management expects the rest of the year to be weaker.
  • Interest takes 34% of operating profit, net leverage is 3.99x, debt rose $491.7 million in the quarter, and operating cash flow was negative.
  • The Refrigerated & Frozen unit has zero cushion above carrying value and its profit just fell 13%. Another impairment needs only one bad forecast.

Our Take. This was a quarter of good cost control and good luck in wheat, reported by a company whose core product sold fewer units at a lower gross margin. We do not hold the joint venture against Conagra; 44% of a well-run flour miller is a real asset. But it should not be mistaken for a turn in packaged food, and the company's own guidance does not mistake it. The line to watch is gross margin. It has fallen from 27.7% to 23.8% in two years, and the plan to fix it is more pricing into a consumer the 10-Q itself calls price-sensitive. If gross margin stabilizes near 24% while volume declines narrow, the halved dividend and falling debt make this a slow repair that works. If it keeps falling, overhead has little left to give, and Refrigerated & Frozen is one more weak year from another write-down.

Source: https://beancount.io/blog/2026/10/08/conagra-fy2027-q1-earnings-analysis

Published: October 8, 2026